Not a likely scenario, methinks |
Trump has managed to piss off the whole Mexican nation. It seems his
talk of building a wall between the US and Latin America was not just idle
rhetoric. And to be fair he did garner much of the US vote because of his
stated intention to go ahead with the project. Not following through on
election promises is not unknown to politicians. But Trump is no politician,
he's a businessman and it looks like he really is going to run the country as
if it was one mega-business-corporation. Should be an interesting ride.
The wall is not impossible to build, just difficult and expensive.
As I recall from third grade geography at Tipton Secondary Modern, the border
between the US and Mexico runs for about 1,900 miles. It traverses diverse
landscapes: rivers (Colorado and Rio Grande), flood plains, mountains and
inhospitable desert. For the wall proper, concrete will be the ideal choice for
construction. Initially, Trump was thinking of building a solid concrete
barrier throughout, although he has now come to contemplate the practicalities
and is considering interspersing the concrete wall with traditional fencing.
The wall does not have to extend the whole length of the border as nature
closes down great swathes of the marchland. The cheapest 'wall' and best
impediment to human movement, especially of the unwanted variety, is large
expanses of water. Mother Nature always knows best in this regard. I should
know as I live in New Zealand which nestles in the south pacific, 1,000 leagues
from the nearest land. But the Americans don't have this luxury.
Experts reckon that only a third of the border requires a wall
barrier. Several parts of the border constitute a challenge from both
engineering and logistic perspectives- building walls in flood plains can be
bothersome. Sectors of the border region are remote and difficult to access by
man and material. Cement and men will need to move from areas of manufacture to
areas of remote wall building. The answer of course is temporary settlements
which rove as the wall progresses. The wall at one point will encroach on a
Native American Reservation. The tribal elders have already expressed
resistance to allowing a wall to cross land under their jurisdiction and Trump
will need a Congressional bill to force the issue. Unfortunately he doesn’t
have recourse to shooting the natives or infecting them with smallpox as in
times of yore. In New Zealand we have a similar problem regarding the Maoris,
however we are allowed to shoot them on one day of the year as long as it is
before noon (Waitangi Day- hooray). Eat lead pesky Maoris! Stop digressing
Flaxen.
As for cost: now there is an imponderable conundrum. No one really
knows how much it will cost but estimates range from 10 to 20 billion dollars.
This does not include annual maintenance and upkeep which adds on 750 million dollars per annum. Trump will also need to budget for 21,000 agents to patrol the barrier ($1.4 billion a year). Actually
the wall could act as an economic stimulus as numerous industries are required.
Transport is a must as are large amounts of construction manpower. And this is definitely a long term project. The irony of course is that a fair chunk of the
manpower building and patrolling the wall will be of Mexican descent, all
labouring away to keep their stealing, raping, brethren out.
Trump reckons the Mexicans will pay for the wall. The Mexicans say
nay. Looks like a classical Mexican standoff to me. Hola! Of course Trump does
not expect the Mexican government to pay the US administration directly. It has
been suggested that a 20% import tax could be levied on Mexican goods entering
the US. This could gather about 13 billion dollars a year. It is estimated that
around 25 billion dollars is sent to Mexico every year by Mexicans residing in
the US. This represents 2% of the Mexican GDP. By threatening to stem this flow
of gelt the US could conceivably exert a powerful lever on the Mexican
government to cough up funds or risk economic recession. However, this plan if
implemented would severely damage Mexican-US diplomatic relations. Even hard
core Republicans are not keen on this plan as it has the obvious taint of
extortion. As a hard nosed businessman this argument is unlikely to bother
Trump. Less provocative measures involve increasing fees on visas applications
and border crossing cards.
Though I wouldn't go as far as saying that I’m starting to like
Trump, he is certainly earning my respect. The fact that he is stirring the
international political pot and causing concern and consternation amongst
career politicians, even within his own party, is no bad thing
Just a final word on the effectiveness of the wall stemming
illegal immigration: Although I have no doubt that the wall will have a major
impact on unwanted human traffic, especially in areas of high population
density, it will also encourage economic migrants to force passage
through difficult and relatively inaccessible border regions. And I wonder how
long it will take the 'human traffickers' to organise and facilitate these
crossing attempts? Where human desperation and misery are conjoined with human
ingenuity and the potential to make squidoodles (not a real word) of cash,
anything is possible.
Er...hardly a thousand league, Saxon!
ReplyDeleteAussie is about 2,582 miles away which is equivalent to 861 land leagues. Allowing for the equinox and Swedish rounding I reckon a 1,000 leagues is a fair estimate considering that my new medication allows me to see double when I close my blind eye.
DeleteI remember a trip to China about 25 years ago at least. They were talking about building a canal system between the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers. Every year, one floods while the other is in drought so it made perfect sense.
ReplyDeleteA yank on our boat asked 'Will they use nuclear charges to dig it out?'
The chinese presenter replied 'No. Three million workers with pick and shovel'
A Mexican wall will create one hell of a lot of jobs!