The folk
who promote 'intelligent design' as a means for biological change will wax
lyrical about the perfection of the human body and parts contained therein as
evidence of god's handiwork. We are supposed to accept that an invisible god by
means unknown caused life to come into effect and become perfection as
exemplified in the human body? And this is supposed to be accepted as a rival
'scientific theory' to evolution and should be taught as part of the legitimate
science curriculum in schools? I would rather burn down the school to stop this
from happening. By the way, the conflagration of my alma mater, Tipton
Secondary Modern, the day after I left was simply a weird and uncanny coincidence.
And anyway, I had a caste iron alibi so them crafty Peelers could never pin the
caper on me, although they did sorely try. Sorry, I'm starting to digress and reminisce.
So what can we say about the design of the human body and what does it tell us
about the supreme artificer himself?
I'll take
the prostate gland as an example. This walnut sized gland nestles quaintly in
the lower abdomen and encases the tube (urethra) which passes from the bladder
to the penis. This cheeky little gland is responsible for
supplying fluid for the ejaculate. It is said that a man can experience great
pleasure if the gland is manipulated trans-rectally. However, this is something
I know nothing about and consequently will mention said topic, nevermore,
except to state that a great deal of lube is required (arse, big sore
arse).
At first
glance, everything in the design department seems all well and good, even
peachy. A gland designed to perform a particular task which it does with
veritable aplomb and die hard efficiency. The problem arises as we age. As men
reach their mature years there is a tendency for the prostate to enlarge and
become knobbly. At a certain stage the
engorged prostatic tissue will start to impinge on the relatively narrow
urethra squeezing and crushing until the afflicted male experiences the
unpleasant symptom of restrained micturition. I have never experienced this
problem myself although I have heard that it is enough to turn a sane man into a
god and back again in a single night, with all the trappings of extreme suffering. Read the Bible and you will
see what I mean. Frequent toilet breaks are required to squeeze pitiful drops
of scalding urine from a painfully distended bladder. Eventually drugs no
longer control the situation and a visit to the surgeon is necessary to return
the urethra to some form of useful patency. So you have got to ask why a
so-called loving, all knowing, all powerfull deity would have purposely designed such an
organ with an inbuilt propensity to enlarge as we approach our dotage? Is the
Lord possessed of a wicked sense of humour? Mayhap this obvious design flaw was
overlooked during the planning stage. Of course, we can never remonstrate with
god because he is invisible and not prone to chatter with the likes of mere
mortals. But it clearly shows that god, if he truly deserves the designation,
is not so perfect after all.
I am not a
practical man, my talents lie elsewhere. Whenever a shelf is to be put up or a
deck to be stained I turn to my son in law. However, even I can see that the
prostate gland should have been placed elsewhere. I'm thinking a little to the
left and behind the urethra without encirclement. With expansion there would be
a little benign nudging thus allowing old men to sleep soundly without frequent
and exquisite trips to the pisser.
There is
another possible scenario which is not usually considered by laity and turbulent priests
alike. Could it possibly be that god is actually a 'women' with a grievance
against all mankind? Or maybe evolution is at work. An evolutionary shaping which
makes do and adapts elder existing structures to new roles as function demands.
A force which shapes organisms within certain biological restrictions and
constraints. We therefore end up with a patchwork of body parts, spare parts
included, which could no doubt be improved upon by an omniscient, omnipotent
designer, if only we could find one.
No comment required |
My wife reckons that God IS a woman, and one with a sense of humour. Who else but a woman would give a man a brain and a penis but only enough blood to operate one at a time?
ReplyDeleteYour wife is a wise woman and has insight into the male psyche. My wife reckons I can hold only three concepts in my befuddled nogin: Katy Perry, jelly wrestling and Katy Perry jelly wrestling. Go figure. Us men are wretched and simple creatures.
DeleteAnother thing to think of: Why are our eyes inside out? If I was designing an optical system, the lens would cause the light to fall directly on the receptors, not through blood vessels first. Unlike the Cephalopoda who seem to have got it right. Now why would a sensible designer do that? Unless they are like British Leyland (bless 'em) and creating an 'Allegro' from the parts bin. Which may explain a lot.
ReplyDeleteLike: Why do Muslim Women have to wear a burkha? 'Cos in Old Mo's eyes they would be over age....
Too true Tony. Most mammalian bits and pieces could be improved upon by a competent architect. Years ago, when I didn't know any better, I used to 'debate' religious folk concerning 'Intelligent Design' etc. But of course you can't debate with these people and the last thing they want to do is to reply rationally. Ain't dat the sad truth.
Delete