Behold a great man |
Charles Darwin was typical of the gentleman savant of 18th/19th century
Charles
Robert Darwin was born in 1809 to English landed gentry in the town of Shrewsbury , situated
north-west of Tipton. Darwin was originally
destined to become a physician, like his father, and began study in 1829 at Edinburgh University . However, Darwin was not enamoured with the profession
and had the ungentlemanly (not a real word, but you get the drift) habit
of fainting at the sight of blood. Darwin 's
father thought that a change in career choice would be in order and Darwin dutifully resumed
his studies and prepared for a career in the Church as an Ordained Minister.
During this time Darwin
developed a passion for natural history and geology and he was fortunate to
come under the wing of a succession of eminent scholars. In 1831 he was awarded
a BA degree in Theology. Darwin
was considered a lack lustre student and perhaps a poor intellect by his father
and peers. In Victorian England the route to the parish was paved with the sons
of the rich who were considered not bright enough to pursue a conventional
career in Medicine or Law.
As the
ship's naturalist, Darwin
took a keen interest in the exotic fauna he encountered. I'll not dwell too
much on his research as it is not the purpose of this brief post. Needless to
say his experiences whilst on the Beagle gave forth to a germ of an idea which
when fully matured gave birth to his theories on natural selection and
evolution. His famous book: 'Origin of the Species' was finally published in
1859. Even without his work on natural selection, Darwin would be considered an exceptional
scientist due to his ground breaking work in geology and biology in general.
He was the foremost authority on earthworms, beetles and animal husbandry. What
is so astonishing is that he never received a formal education in the sciences.
Darwin
represents the last of the Great English Gentleman Naturalists.
In
regard to the theory of evolution, all the pieces of the puzzle were available
to the astute biologist of the mid 19th century. It took a genius to place all
the bits of evidence into a comprehensive whole. Actually, the theory of
evolution is deceptively simple, so simple that only a genius could have worked
it out. So what were the great Darwinian/Wallace insights? It can be considered
thusly:
It is
an observation that organisms will rapidly breed until a check intervenes. Most
likely this will occur due to an exhaustion of available resources, usually
food.
Individuals
within a species differ in their behavioural and physical characteristics and
these characteristics are heritable.
Changes
in the environment drive selection. Those organism best suited to a given
environment, at a given time, thrive and beget more offspring than their less
'biologically fit' brethren. Thus adaptive traits become fixed in the surviving
population. Over eons large scale biological change can occur in a population
resulting in the formation of new species. .
That is
the quintessence of evolution. The rest is mere commentary- go read.
It is
difficult for modern educated folk (most at least) to imagine the impact Darwin ’s theory had on
the scientific community and Victorian society in general during the mid 19th
century. Most scientists welcomed the theory and rapidly assimilated its
implications. The established church and those of a conservative nature, or of
a pious disposition (often the same thing), recoiled in horror. The advance of
science was almost complete in removing the need for a deity to describe nature
and natural phenomenon. The ‘God of the gaps’ had nowhere to scurry and
shrivelled under the cleansing light of the scientific method (you couldn’t
resist waxing lyrical, could you Flaxen?). As for poor Wallace, the man never
received the credit he deserved. But this was not of Darwin ’s doing. Darwin
remained, always a fair, equitable man and it is not Darwin ’s fault that history has been unkind
to Wallace. Perhaps one day I’ll redeem and redress the balance and give fair
credit to Wallace’s contribution. Or perhaps I’ll forget, who can say?
If you
would like to gain insight into Darwin and 'Evolutionary Theory', consider the
following links and be amazed: Darwin influences Preamble Evolution
Good article about a clever bloke from a clever family. Thanks - I'm enjoying your trilogy.
ReplyDeleteWe used to live near Lichfield, & periodically visited Erasmus (Charles' grandad) Darwin's house. It is open to the public as an independent museum & well worth a visit. One day I'll make it to Charles pad in Kent, too.
I don't read much fiction, but my daughter gave me a copy of "This Thing of Darkness", by Harry Thompson & I really enjoyed it. It is a historical novel written around a fictionalised biography of Robert FitzRoy - he who took command of HMS Beagle halfway through her first voyage before undertaking the more famous one with Charles Darwin as his companion. If you already have the facts & scientific background this book provides a structure to nail things to. It's easy to spot & forgive the bits of artistic licence for the sake of the overall story.
DevonshireDozer.
Thanks for the endorsement. I'll see if I can get hold of a copy of the book you mention.
DeleteFS, have you seen this?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/aug/30/charles-darwin-victorian-mythmaker-an-wilson-review
Thanks for the link. I wasn’t aware of the biography by A. N. Wilson, until now. The thrust of his book does not surprise me. At every turn he sets out to denigrate Darwin and accuse him of cruelty, plagiarism and racism. He insinuates that Darwin’s theory influenced Hitler’s National Socialism- which it did. But that is hardly Darwin’s fault. Darwin presented his theory as a scientist should. If it does not fit well with modern liberal socialist theories, so be it. Darwin should always be viewed as a product of his time and class.
DeleteA N Wilson is a wretch of a man and a purveyor of cheap, tawdry, sensationalist, journalism. I’ve only managed to read one of his books all the way through, a supposed ‘biography’ of Jesus. Don’t bother to read the book- tis shite and chock full of errors as you would expect from a second rate intellect who can’t be bothered to undertake in depth research.
Darwin also is (one way or another) responsible for the eponymous awards given posthumously to sundry cretins over the years. These have amused me greatly, and were instrumental in my taking up schadenfreude as a pastime.
ReplyDeleteAye Ted, the 'Darwin Awards', where the intellectually challenged voluntarily remove themselves from the gene pool- stops them pissing in it. Actually Ted, you have given me an idea for a post: watch this space.
DeleteI watch with bated breath - and eager eyes!
Delete"It is an observation that organisms will rapidly breed ..."
ReplyDeleteJust adjusted my glasses - organism, yes it's organism. Misread it for a moment.
James, still your dirty mind- it should read: onanism.
Delete