![]() |
| Big Chas, in Repose |
The theory of evolution first put forward by Charles Darwin
in his seminal book of 1859 ‘The Origin of the Species’ is the best explanation
of how species change through time. Although biologists may argue/debate about
subtle aspects of the theory, few serious minded biologists dispute its
relevance to modern scientific thought. However, there are those who, driven by
religious dogma, think otherwise. There is a strain/stain in religion which
would deny cogent scientific theory and replace it with something called, ‘Creation
Science.’ Now by placing the word ‘science’ after another word, don’t make it
so. Don’t be fooled, don’t be beguiled, this is not science.
Science is a
process. First you have a hypothesis. The hypothesis is an initial postulation
of why something is. This is followed by gathering of data (by experimentation,
hopefully). If the data supports the hypothesis, and after much peer review,
the hypothesis may become theory. Science demands that theories are constantly
challenged, by new data. Once an established theory becomes untenable due to
the inevitable march of scientific knowledge, it may become discarded and
replaced by a new, better theory. But mostly the old theory just requires
tweaking. Most good science moves forward by slow, imperceptible progress.
If a generation is lucky they experience a paradigm shift in
knowledge. But this is unusual. For every Newton, Einstein, Faraday, Darwin and
Feynman, there are a thousand, solid scientists doing good work. Now let us contrast this with the process of ‘Creation
Science’. The whole hypothesis can be
summed up by: ‘God did it’. That’s it. An invisible, unknowable supernatural
entity causes things to happen by means unknown. This is not a process, at
least in the rational sense. And religious adherents are asked to believe and
not to question. This is dogmatic religious belief not science.













