tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post4976877759487102889..comments2024-03-28T17:58:25.581+13:00Comments on The Flaxen Saxon Chronicles: You are never alone with solipsism Flaxen Saxonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-73170823157640733222022-02-28T16:53:48.122+13:002022-02-28T16:53:48.122+13:00Hi Flaxen,
if it needed corona to melt away the l...Hi Flaxen, <br />if it needed corona to melt away the last rest of europe´s ratio, it worked best in Moscow. Fuckin sick Mr Putin seems keen in to manage the end of civilization. Guess Zealand is one of the better places to sleep well those days. In case of your existence (ever seen the movie "existenz" by David Cronenberg? real good surrealistic stuff) would you mind to answer me by e-mail please? Will make conversation a bit easier:<br />abacuspictures@aol.com <br />Meanwhile I´ve got some of the letters exchanged by Christine Ladd-Franklin and Bertie Russell in the early 20th century. There was more than the one, Russell mentioned it that anecdote. Should have been 12 or more and I have 7 oven them - pretty delightening and easy to attach on a mail.<br />Happy to hear from you - yours Josh<br />"the 4th worldwar will be done with sticks and stones" A.Einstein <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-86605485117706068402021-06-23T08:49:46.182+12:002021-06-23T08:49:46.182+12:00I'm aware of Henry Rollins- an interesting cha...I'm aware of Henry Rollins- an interesting character for sure. Now Charles Bukowski is (was) an extremely interesting character. I've been looking for other solipsists but when I find them they tell me I don't exist. I'm starting to believe them. Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-19849101789116504062021-06-22T22:58:07.659+12:002021-06-22T22:58:07.659+12:00Hi Flaxon, you may know Henry Rollins. I just read...Hi Flaxon, you may know Henry Rollins. I just read "Solipist". Bit disapointed - expected more. Mr Rollins is not (half the writer as) Charles Bukowski. A solipist is not a misanthrope (like H. Rollins tells us, that he is) A solipsist is a constructivist. Blaming your construction if it is not to your liking? Don´t complain, better do better. You are never alone with solipsism. Very right. A solipsist is not alone - a solipist is on his own. The superb moment, when a solipsist finds another true solipsist, plausibilism is going to start (...blowing minds). Enjoy! Yours Josh Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-56371160778633279342021-06-18T20:43:38.463+12:002021-06-18T20:43:38.463+12:00Hi Josh, will check out the link. Good luck with t...Hi Josh, will check out the link. Good luck with the book sales.Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-90817435570871660402021-06-18T13:01:04.061+12:002021-06-18T13:01:04.061+12:00Hi Flax,
seen Bojack Horseman Season 6, Ep. 8,ope...Hi Flax, <br />seen Bojack Horseman Season 6, Ep. 8,opening scene? Pretty cool. <br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvX9sL5qkwc<br /><br />I´ve just found a publisher to publish my book "THE PLAUSIBILISM" Not so easy to write, but done before 2021 is over. It´s in the tradition of Sartre´s "The being an the nothing", but far beyond of existentialism, constructivism, solipsism... well it´s... plausibilism! Not less than the most advanced concept in epistemology is going to become available then. Have fun. Great good greets. JoshAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-33301511107929698932021-03-27T20:53:17.813+13:002021-03-27T20:53:17.813+13:00Indeed Josh, the world is an oyster, without the p...Indeed Josh, the world is an oyster, without the pearl. I decided long ago that the system in Britain is fucked and thus I emigrated to the last bastion of European secularism. Here, as an exile in a foreign land, I will live my life in veritable comfort far from the world's woes..... But what of my children and grandkids. Mayhap they will have to fight again for hard won freedoms. Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-54161554731168904582021-03-27T16:12:10.805+13:002021-03-27T16:12:10.805+13:00Hi Flaxon,
long time ago that I´ve heard from you....Hi Flaxon,<br />long time ago that I´ve heard from you. Hope you are fine on board, while this weird corona-campaign is wiping out the last poor rests of ratio in Europe and may be all over the planet. Plausibilism is doing pretty well to immune against that rubbish oozing out of all medias, but unfortunately not against the consequenses of those firestarters. Anyway - we´ll never surrender. Great good greets, Josh Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-22406365489134006282019-07-09T14:39:32.051+12:002019-07-09T14:39:32.051+12:00Hi Flaxen,
very right! - unfortunately this is blo...Hi Flaxen,<br />very right! - unfortunately this is bloody true. Britain, France, Germany + other European key-countries actually have to face a massive muslim invasion, strategically clean planned, overwhelming well funded and done incredibly straight. No Francis Drake, no Horatio Nelson and no Winston Churchill are in to prevent us from that and even if... the bravest RAF-Squadrons won´t be of any effect. Well - the christians needed 400 years to conquer the roman empire from inside, but finally they got it and ruined 900 years of progress in just one decade for more than 1.200 years - until R. Descartes liberated the human mind again by Rationalism. Easy to watch this wheel turning back much faster today. And yes - absurd enough, that just those political powers, who might be the first to be eliminated, are the ones, who welcome this mess. Anyway - all I can do is: Plausiblism (it can´t fail, if Solipsism is right - if it´s wrong, Europe has to prepare to listen to the worst thinkable music for a very long time. But then, this ain´t no problem of our generation anymore - Rock´n Roll forever<br />Josh.<br /><br />p.s. A.Camus is a fool - Sysyphos ain´t never a happy chap<br /> <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-68878429146543627342019-07-08T19:37:57.759+12:002019-07-08T19:37:57.759+12:00Hi Josh, I would consider myself a West Saxon. Tod...Hi Josh, I would consider myself a West Saxon. Today I live as an exiled Englishman in New Zealand. Let us be honest: Europe has gone to hell for reasons only too apparent for those that can see. I had a Germen fellow stay with me last week and he spoke of the horrors in his land as a result of unrestrained immigration. Leftist, so called liberal politicians, are hell-bent in destroying Western culture and civilisation. Anyway, Josh, I will visit your site and comment accordingly.<br />Cheers, FS.Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-82836112549832844622019-07-08T15:44:18.696+12:002019-07-08T15:44:18.696+12:00Hi Flaxen Saxon (Essex, Wessex, Sussex... wich par...Hi Flaxen Saxon (Essex, Wessex, Sussex... wich part of Saxony are you from...?).<br />to let you know, who I am, you may visite my websites.<br />http://kristina-und-descartes.de<br />http://darwins-slipslop.de<br />https://www.kultursalon-hamburg.de<br />with solipsistic greets from Hamburg<br />Josh<br /><br />p.s.: to add the atheist/agnostic-discuss: any christian, jew, muslim has to face it as a valid historical fact, that the abrahamic god, they are all believing in (it´s the same chap to all of them, no bomb-belt will change that), is a fictional character created by Pharao Echn Aton something 1350 b.c... This information is easy to get by few mouseclicks for any agnostic, who changes into a gnostic automatically same moment then.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-64158935299352056732019-07-05T12:27:38.285+12:002019-07-05T12:27:38.285+12:00Very right - W. Occam´s cool way to approach/solve...Very right - W. Occam´s cool way to approach/solve problems is part of Plausibilism - but it´s an epestemological model that means much more. For ex., to accept infinity as the next thinkable dimension, after time and space... Tricky Mr. Einstein is talking about spacetime as a new (5th) dimension, but in fact, any time is spacetime (time ain´t use to follow a line). <br />Forget the daemon. (Shure, it´s pretty entertaining, but..) As mentioned, a chance of it´s exsistence is of incredible poor probability. Not worth to spend energy on this idea. Solipsism is very worth. Thrilling, stunning and brandnew - if thought in a positive way. It changes nearly everything. Any successful new epistemological system did so (Bacon´s Empirism, Descarte´s Rationalims...!!! - without them/that, we would not have systematical nat. or soc. sciences) Schopenhauer or Sartre dealt with Solipsism, but understood it very negative only - I guess because it is so uncharming to tell the ladies, that they might be nothing but just images of your mind. Nethertheless, dreaming of a girl is exactly that - and none can say, that this, what is presumed as reality, is something else but a dream too. C. Nolan did a nice job spinning off Inception from Linklater´s Waking life. <br /><br />Josh<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-44070280755275695682019-07-01T16:52:56.906+12:002019-07-01T16:52:56.906+12:00Plausibilism- sound a bit like 'Occam's ra...Plausibilism- sound a bit like 'Occam's razor'. Why posit unnecessary complexity? As for the evil daemon, if it exists, it must be a naughty little tike/sprite judging from the thoughts that appear unbidden in my head. Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-16935668916278333602019-06-29T14:45:35.767+12:002019-06-29T14:45:35.767+12:00Well, well, pretty nice latenight solipsistic self...Well, well, pretty nice latenight solipsistic self-conversation.<br /><br />Right! - it is thinkable, that some crazed god (evil daemon), a kind of weird radio station (Black Knight satelite, Matrix-Machines...), telepathic versed aliens... etc., could think, dream, feel... for us by sending their manipulations into our mind. <br /><br />BUT: there ain´t no proof, that any of such creeps are existing. In fact, it is of very poor probability.<br />On the other hand, you have a 100% garanty, that you are exiting. R. Descartes´s "I´m thinking, therefore I am" is very convincing in that way, and even if you are nothing but a dumb receiver of stranger´s thoughts you definitely have to exist. <br /><br />Exactly this is one of the reasons, that inspired me to develope a theory of cognition named PLAUSIBILISM - as the best chance to verify the most probable "truth" from different options is to accept the most plausible one.<br /><br />Plausibilism is correlating very fine with advanced Solipsism (think of Aristotle´s Oganon, meant as a toolbox of fundamental philosophy). <br /><br />Solipsist or part of the pack - me/we am doubtless sitting in Plato´s fucking shadow cave and actually plausibilism - this, plus learning lucid dreaming, an astoundingly fine working method to get control over your own dreams - is the most promising way to find the exit. <br /><br />Great good fortune<br />Josh Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-87683631603214812052019-05-10T09:46:24.939+12:002019-05-10T09:46:24.939+12:00I’ve always wondered what Mrs Kidd’s recollection ...I’ve always wondered what Mrs Kidd’s recollection of the anecdote would have been? Perhaps not so silly? Or maybe she was injecting a little humour into flaccid philosophy? You are of course right- Bertrand was a very naughty boy. Personally, I would have had him shot for his display of treason during the Great War. At least Wittgenstein served, hernia and all.<br /><br />When has the dreamer been a ‘conscious’ creator? I would think it represented solipsism at its most chaotic? Have you ever considered direction from an evil daemon? - I have. At least it would explain the level of casual violence I experience when in the hands of Morpheus. <br /><br />Perhaps solipsism anticipated Biocentrism. Tis but a flick away from a world created by a collective consciousness to a world captured by one mind. As for the meaning of life……. In a post scientific paradigm why should we need one? <br /><br />You bring to mind someone I used to know- could it be? Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-14236788846283524532019-05-09T14:26:47.453+12:002019-05-09T14:26:47.453+12:00First to say... Russell was no Gentleman. Doing a ...First to say... Russell was no Gentleman. Doing a cheap joke on the back of Christine Ladd Franklin, instead of telling her, that his close friend, lover (with whom he fucked a lot around) and colleaque as Prof. Phil. at Cambridge Univ., Ludwig Wittgenstein, was a solipsist. Bad, bad and tiny Bertie<br /><br />Second: Dreaming means solipsism on it´s best. Who else but the dreamer only can be the creator of the world, the dreamer is living in while dreaming? Having that proof, that you are able to create rich and complex worlds, why shouldn´t you create the world you call reality? In a dream, the creator is not allmighty... (do not think in the chliches of god-characters, they are all fictional) but you can learn to control your dreams... see movies: Inception and Waking Life<br /><br />Third: Solipsism is the consequence of the development of the European theories of cognition (fundamental philosophy - such as rationalism, empirism, sceptizism, idealism, phenomenlogy, existentialism, constructivism...) - the actually most advanced theory and the very only one, that is able to answer any essential question: such as: meaning of life, where are we comming from/going to... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6745817778350624453.post-60213617500823069292014-10-18T10:52:19.555+13:002014-10-18T10:52:19.555+13:00Most interesting. It has been a theory of mine for...Most interesting. It has been a theory of mine for many years but until now I had no idea that anyone else has actually proposed it or that there was a name for it.<br /><br />It is, of course, an argument that it is impossible to beat down because if it is my mind that is creating what I perceive as existence, then your arguing with me is irrelevant because you are a figment of my imagination.<br /><br />I have often thought, however, that if this theory is true then my mind must be truly disturbed to invent the kind of shite that I see going on all around me...Dioclesehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08139646438543954337noreply@blogger.com